Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
Its core module is an inversion of control container for injecting dependencies at runtime.
In any case, inoculation of the positive control container is always performed in an area separated from the critical manufacturing area.
There was significant heterogeneity in the occurrence of recontamination among households; only 58% (enterococci) and 46% (E. coli) of household control pairs showed more contamination in the household than in the control container after 1 day of storage.
In 59 households, water was collected from the same source at the same time as the household members filled their water containers, and a sample of this source water was also stored in a control container similar to those most commonly used in the households (a 10-gal plastic jerry can).
Similar(56)
Control containers, which were kept covered and in controlled conditions in the field laboratory, were resampled in parallel.
Control containers were sterilized with boiling water between samples.
Last, differences between household and control containers represent total recontamination under household conditions.
We also calculated the mean of paired log differences for samples from sources versus control containers (representing natural attenuation), sources versus household containers (representing net attenuation in the home), and household containers versus control containers (representing in-home recontamination).
Average quantity of invertebrates from different orders that colonized control containers (containers without crayfish) ±SE in High Lake, Big Lake and Papoose Lake in summer 2011.
Household containers had on average 0.05 1 (enterococci) and 0.06 0.6 (E. coli) log higher indicator counts than did control containers.
Even if regrowth of indicator organisms had occurred, the use of control containers allowed us to assess the total change in contamination occurring within the household, by using the difference between indicator counts in household and control containers.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com