Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Spoiler alert: this blog contains plot details for Heaven Sent, episode 11 of the 35th series of Doctor Who on BBC1 Well, to quote some of the more mischievous contributors below the line, that was no Robot of Sherwood.
With Ronald's penchant for peepholes and trapdoors and his knack for carefully rummaging the fridge and diary of his invaders, the film's tone can kinda-maybe be labeled Afterschool De Palma, although many of the contributors below would probably agree it's much weirder and radder still.
Similar(58)
With a tip of the hat to Beanio, a contributor below the line last week who suggested this, comes an examination of when runs are being scored in those biggest of totals.
Quora users discussed some lessons they've learned along the way in the thread, "What are the top 10 things we should be informed about in life?" Users had many more than 10 tips to offer, and we've collected and paraphrased some of the best advice, arranged by contributor below.
The authors also wish to thank all contributors listed below.
Some of the contributors are listed below.
Cunningfox, a frequent and valued contributor to the below-the-line life of our reviews, quibbled, but only about the decline, brusquely summing up the matter: Front arena: quiet, attentive and extremely knowledgeable.
Akka, a regular and knowledgeable contributor to the below-the-line life of the Guardian's classical reviews, also turned up on Andrew Clements' review of Donald Runnicles's (mis)handling of Strauss's Four Last Songs, which the reviewer thought "distinctly unradiant" (and Akka "a car crash").
Except for Dr. Fava, whose financial competing interests are listed below, all other contributors report they have no competing interests.
Except for Dr. Fava and Dr. Chang, whose financial competing interests are listed below, all other contributors report they have no competing interests.
Many thanks to all readers and below-the-line contributors.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com