contributions with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "contributions with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; a more appropriate phrase would be "contributions to" or "contributions of." Example: "Her contributions to the project were invaluable."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We have to balance higher contributions with basic fairness.

The Guardian

In financial terms, Mr. Monserrate is leading the group in campaign contributions, with $68,000.

The New York Times

Until then, Mrs. Astor mixed her financial contributions with an active role in decision making.

The New York Times

GuardianWitness is now on Facebook, as we wanted to share your contributions with a wider audience.

The Guardian

*Provide more detailed disclosure of contributions, with records computerized for electronic access.

The New York Times

So five contributions with, to a greater or lesser extent, something to commend them.

The Guardian - Sport

So already one had begun to take his contributions with a modicum of salt.

The Guardian - Tech

Becker balanced his theoretical contributions with practical works on methods of social research.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Now companies simply need to be able measure their net contributions with a degree of accuracy and comparability.

The Guardian

Mr. Brook-Krasny is next in contributions with $22,993, and he has received $30,808 in matching funds.

The New York Times

Visiting the Middle East in 1880, the American Jewish author Simon Wolf contrasted these contributions with the avarice of Europe.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity and correctness, substitute "with" for prepositions like "to" or "of" depending on the intended meaning. For example, instead of "contributions with", use "contributions to the project" to indicate what was contributed to.

Common error

Avoid using "with" when a different preposition such as "to" or "of" would be more grammatically appropriate. "Contributions with" often sounds awkward; consider whether "contributions to", indicating direction, or "contributions of", indicating the source, better captures your meaning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "contributions with" appears in various contexts, attempting to link contributions to other elements. However, based on Ludwig AI's analysis, its use is generally considered grammatically questionable and would be better replaced with more appropriate prepositions like "to" or "of".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

37%

Encyclopedias

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "contributions with" appears frequently across diverse sources, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically questionable. The intended purpose is typically to show an association, but more precise prepositions such as "to" or "of" are recommended for clarity and correctness. Usage spans neutral registers in News & Media and Science, but its grammatical ambiguity makes it less suitable for Formal and Scientific contexts. When aiming for precision, consider replacing "contributions with" with phrases like "contributions to" or "contributions of" to ensure grammatical accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

contributions alongside

This emphasizes parallel or simultaneous contributions.

contributions combined with

Highlights the merging or integration of different contributions.

contributions coupled with

Indicates a close relationship or association between contributions.

contributions in conjunction with

Suggests contributions working together or in cooperation.

contributions blended with

Implies a seamless integration of different contributions.

contributions supplemented by

Focuses on how contributions are enhanced or completed by others.

contributions associated with

Highlights a connection or link between contributions and a specific area.

contributions attributed to

Focuses on giving credit or recognizing the source of contributions.

contributions integrated into

Highlights how contributions are incorporated into a larger system.

contributions in association with

Suggests contributions working together or in cooperation.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use the word "contributions"?

The word "contributions" is usually followed by the prepositions "to" or "of". For example, "contributions to a project" or "contributions of time and effort" are grammatically correct.

Is "contributions with" grammatically correct?

According to Ludwig AI, the phrase "contributions with" is generally considered incorrect. It is recommended to use alternative prepositions such as "to" or "of" for better grammatical accuracy.

What can I use instead of "contributions with"?

Depending on the context, you can replace "contributions with" with phrases like "contributions to", "contributions of", or "contributions alongside".

How does the meaning change when using "contributions to" versus "contributions of"?

"Contributions to" indicates what something is being contributed towards, while "contributions of" indicates what something consists of. For example, "contributions to the fund" versus "contributions of money and resources".