The phrase "contributions were significant" is grammatically correct and commonly used in written English.
You can use this phrase when describing the impact or importance of someone's contributions in a specific context. For example: - "The team's contributions were significant in achieving the company's quarterly goals." - "Her contributions were significant in advancing the field of medical research." - "The volunteers' contributions were significant in helping to rebuild the community after the disaster."
Those contributions were significant because Svetlana Abrosimova had an off day.
Consequently, while David Ives is credited as the author of Venus in Fur, which is adapted from a book, only Mark Twain gets credit for Is He Dead?, even though I happen to know David's contributions were significant on making the latter play stageworthy.
Needham's contributions were significant and substantial, and only ceased when he was too critically ill to work.
In all the three intercept-only models, the contributions were significant and indicated that determining association without the control of variables at different levels would give a misleading result.
Several contributions are significant.
Their contributions are significant too; they established some of Iran's first schools for girls in accordance with their belief in the equality of men and women.
The hospitals argue that their contributions are significant, even though charity care is a small percentage of their business.
Observations over a sufficient time make it possible to calculate which contributions are significant at a particular location and, thus, to forecast tidal times and heights.
But, while philanthropy's contributions are significant, the combination of governmental development assistance and private philanthropy is measured in billions; the funding shortfall for the SDGs is in the trillions.
The UK's budgetary contributions are significant and especially pertinent in times of austerity; the common fisheries policy has arguably wrecked the industry and the common agricultural policy is protectionist and costly.
A new methodology is proposed to determine (1) stress intensity factors due to residual stress, Kres, when samples with high residual stress are tested, and (2) effective stress intensity factors, Keff, from corresponding applied stresses when closure contributions are significant.
