contributions back

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "contributions back" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts discussing returning contributions or feedback, but it lacks clarity without additional context. Example: "We appreciate your contributions back to the community, as they help us grow."

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

14 human-written examples

Some of the state parties sent these contributions back to the national committee, state and Federal election records show.

The New York Times

"It does no good to keep people who live here from an education by which they could make contributions back to the state.

The New York Times

"This administration is selling the federal government at bargain basement prices to their corporate friends, who then make campaign contributions back," Mr. Harnage said.

The New York Times

And in his last Budget, Brown put employers' National Insurance contributions back up again, increasing the cost of labour and discouraging job creation.

The Guardian

We hope that the community will find value in the source code, and make contributions back to the StarLogo community via the Uploads and Downloads section of this site.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Cahill played his part as an ambassador, signing numerous autographs before and after the match for the record crowd, the first of many contributions back following his part-FFA-funded estimated $4 million two-year deal with City.

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

46 human-written examples

"For us it's a contribution back to the bottom line," he said.

The New York Times - Arts

Social business investors have the option of eventually getting their original contribution back without any financial returns, keeping both their principal and principles intact.

The New York Times

Recent Fabian polling found that, for those who believed claimants would make a contribution back to society, 49% thought we should spend more on benefits.

The Guardian - Opinion

"It is time for the financial sector to make a contribution back to society," said José Manuel Barroso, the European Commission president, as he proposed this week a tax on financial transactions.

The New York Times

But if we did get our net contribution back, estimated at about 1% of public spending, we would not only abandon the single market, structural funds, and much else but also have to use some of it to pay for our own versions of EU institutions such as the European Food Safety Agency and the European Environment Agency.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "contributions back", ensure the context clearly indicates who is returning what to whom. Specificity improves clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "contributions back" without specifying what kind of contributions are being returned and under what circumstances. Lack of context can lead to confusion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "contributions back" functions as a nominal phrase, often implying a return or reimbursement. Ludwig indicates that while used, its clarity can be improved with more specific phrasing. It signifies a reverse flow of resources.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Academia

30%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Science

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "contributions back" is an acceptable but not ideally clear expression for indicating the return or reimbursement of contributions. Ludwig shows it appearing across various contexts such as news, academia, and general discussions, but suggests using more specific phrasing for improved clarity. The phrase functions as a nominal phrase and has a neutral register. Ludwig AI indicates potential ambiguity, so specificity is crucial for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Return of contributions

Focuses on the action of returning contributions, adding clarity.

Reimbursement of contributions

Emphasizes the act of reimbursing or compensating for contributions.

Refund of contributions

Highlights the refunding aspect of the contributions.

Repayment of contributions

Stresses the repayment aspect.

Returning contributions

Focuses on the action of returning.

Giving back contributions

Emphasizes the action of giving something back.

Payments back as contributions

Highlights payment structure.

Restitution of contributions

Focuses on the formal act of restoring or returning.

Reverse contributions

Emphasizes the act of reversing the flow of contributions.

Reciprocal contributions

Highlights contributions in opposite directions.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "contributions back" for better clarity?

Consider using alternatives like "return of contributions", "reimbursement of contributions", or "refund of contributions" depending on the specific context.

In what situations is it appropriate to use "contributions back"?

It is suitable when discussing the act of returning something that was initially given as a contribution. For example, returning campaign funds or reimbursing investments.

Is "contributions back" grammatically correct?

While understandable, it is not the most grammatically precise phrase. Alternatives like "returning contributions" might offer clearer phrasing.

What is the difference between "contributions back" and "reciprocal contributions"?

"Contributions back" refers to the act of returning something that was initially contributed. "Reciprocal contributions" implies a mutual exchange of contributions between parties.