Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Thanks to Z Haga, J Reimer, and NG Hatsopoulos for kindly contributing the data and ST Grafton, M Sahani, JM Rebesco, and P Koenig for helpful discussions.
Each partner consulted with their research ethics board to confirm sufficient ethical approval had been attained for contributing the data.
This formal review of the perspectives of all repository stakeholders (i.e. NIDDK, the research centers contributing the data, the subjects providing the data and the data consumers) identified the following core requirements for developing and maintaining a large repository of the scale we envisioned.
Similar(57)
contributed the data and performed the genotyping for validation efforts.
CN contributed the data analysis.
LJF, GV and MS contributed the data for this study.
A.C.M. Luteijn contributed the following: data collection, and data analysis.
You may still contribute the same data to other organizations.
JFW contributed the ORCADES data.
BJH and IH contributed the genotype data.
JCH and AR contributed the myotube data.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com