Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
Scholarly monographs can be written on the industry crosscurrents and divergent management styles that contributed to these discrepancies.
Two factors might have contributed to these discrepancies: (1) the massive host immune response – seen as severe lesions - may have reduced the amount of viable MAP in the tissue and (2) organization and removal of lesions after the clearance of the pathogen take an extended period of time.
Similar(58)
We sought to determine which patient characteristics contribute to these discrepancies.
Methodological problems (imprecision in determination of VO2, assessment of global VO2 instead of regional VO2, poor correlation between systemic oxygenation parameters, and oxygenation in the microcirculation [13]) also may contribute to these discrepancies [31].
Several factors likely contribute to these discrepancies.
Sample bias as well as ethnic differences might contribute to these discrepancies.
There are a number of factors which may contribute to these discrepancies.
Differences in data collection methods and joint angle definitions would partly contribute to these discrepancies.
Differences in the statistical methods used to estimate mortality and to identify prognostic factors may contribute to these discrepancies.
We believe that nursery experiments in the glasshouse rather than under natural conditions contribute to these discrepancies.
Two analytical procedures may contribute to these discrepancies. 1) Total RNA samples used for the PCR assay are different from those used for the microarray assays.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com