Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
contributed to have
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "contributed to have" is not correct and usable in written English.
It seems to be an incorrect combination of words that does not convey a clear meaning. Example: "His efforts contributed to have a successful event" should be rephrased for clarity.
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
3 human-written examples
All authors contributed to, have seen and approved the manuscript.
Science
All authors contributed to, have read and approved the final manuscript.
Science
All authors contributed to, have read, and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
The Dial, the Transcendentalist journal he'd occasionally contributed to, had recently closed.
News & Media
A growing body of research that I have contributed to has found that socioeconomic factors play the leading role.
News & Media
Both partners must contribute to have a successful marriage.
News & Media
There are medical procedures that can contribute to have the risk of having AVN.
Wiki
Having more visuals will contribute to having investors focused on you.
News & Media
It seems that having a diverse team contributes to having better representation in your work.
News & Media
All authors have contributed to and have approved the manuscript.
Science
All authors contributed to and have approved the final version.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using the phrase "contributed to have". Instead, opt for clearer and grammatically correct alternatives like "contributed to achieving" or "helped to create".
Common error
The phrase "contributed to have" is often a result of trying to combine the idea of contributing to something with the desire to express an outcome. To correct this, identify the specific action or outcome you are describing and use a more precise verb form. For example, instead of "His efforts contributed to have a successful event", write "His efforts contributed to achieving a successful event".
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
2.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "contributed to have" is generally intended to express the idea of contributing to a particular outcome or state. However, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI indicates its incorrectness, making it unsuitable for formal writing.
Frequent in
Science
33%
News & Media
33%
Formal & Business
33%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "contributed to have" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in both formal and informal writing. Ludwig AI flags it as incorrect, indicating that it does not conform to standard English grammar. Although the intention is often to express how something aided a specific result, better alternatives like "contributed to achieving" or "helped to create" should be used instead. The phrase appears infrequently across various contexts, including Science, News & Media, and Formal & Business. Therefore, it's best to opt for clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives to ensure effective communication and avoid potential misunderstandings.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
contributed to achieving
This alternative replaces "to have" with "to achieving", focusing on the outcome or accomplishment.
helped to create
This alternative uses a more direct verb, "helped", instead of "contributed", simplifying the sentence structure.
played a part in
This alternative uses an idiomatic expression to indicate involvement or contribution.
aided in establishing
This emphasizes the assistance provided in setting up or founding something.
was instrumental in
This phrase highlights a crucial role in bringing something about.
supported the creation of
This alternative emphasizes backing or promoting the development of something.
assisted in developing
This focuses on the support given during the development process.
was conducive to
This suggests that something helped create a favorable situation for something else to happen.
facilitated the emergence of
This highlights how something made it easier for something new to come into existence.
fostered the growth of
This suggests an action nurtured or promoted expansion or development.
FAQs
What's grammatically wrong with the phrase "contributed to have"?
The phrase "contributed to have" is grammatically incorrect because it illogically combines the verb 'contribute' with the infinitive form 'to have'. A correct usage would involve contributing to a specific outcome or action, such as "contributed to achieving" or "contributed to creating".
How can I rephrase a sentence that contains "contributed to have"?
Instead of using "contributed to have", try more grammatically sound alternatives like "contributed to achieving", "helped to create", or "played a part in", depending on the intended meaning.
Is it ever correct to use the phrase "contributed to have"?
No, the phrase "contributed to have" is generally not considered correct in standard English. It's better to use alternatives that clearly express the contribution towards a specific action or result.
What are some formal alternatives to "contributed to have" in academic writing?
In academic writing, you can use more formal and precise alternatives such as "was instrumental in", "facilitated the emergence of", or "fostered the growth of" to maintain a high level of clarity and grammatical accuracy.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
2.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested