Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

contributed discussion

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "contributed discussion" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts where you want to refer to a discussion that has been added to or enhanced by contributions from various participants. Example: "The contributed discussion during the meeting helped clarify several key points."

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

N.T. drafted the inital manuscript and all authors contributed discussion, writing and interpretation.

Science & Research

Nature

DHC contributed discussion.

BSC contributed discussion.

HJC contributed discussion.

ESK contributed discussion.

HTY contributed discussion.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

CW contributed discussions, and revised the manuscript.

All authors contributed to discussion and writing.

Science & Research

Nature

B.H. and X.Z. also contributed to discussion and manuscript preparation.

Science & Research

Nature

All authors contributed through discussion and reviewed the manuscript.

Science & Research

Nature

All authors contributed to discussion, interpretation and writing.

Science & Research

Nature
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to contributions in a formal context, consider using stronger verbs like "enhanced", "advanced", or "shaped" to describe the impact of the contribution more precisely.

Common error

Avoid using "contributed discussion" when you can specify the nature of the contribution (e.g., "provided critical analysis", "shared insightful observations").

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

80%

Authority and reliability

3.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "contributed discussion" functions as a verb-noun combination, where "contributed" acts as a verb describing the action related to the noun "discussion". Ludwig AI flags it as non-standard. Examples in Ludwig show it describing an action of participating in a discussion.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "contributed discussion" is a less common way to express participation in a discussion, with Ludwig AI classifying the expression as not standard in written English. While grammatically acceptable, stronger and more specific verbs may be preferred for clearer communication. Its usage is primarily found within scientific contexts, although it can be adapted to various situations with appropriate adjustments. When writing, remember that specifying the nature of the contribution is more efficient than using a general phrasing. Consider related alternatives like "participated in the discussion" or "added to the discussion" for improved clarity.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "contributed discussion" for clarity?

Consider using phrases like "participated in the discussion", "added to the discussion", or "enhanced the discussion" for greater clarity depending on the context.

Is "contributed discussion" grammatically correct?

While not incorrect, "contributed discussion" isn't the most common or idiomatic phrasing. It's more common to say someone "participated in the discussion" or "added to the discussion".

What are some stronger alternatives to "contributed discussion"?

For more impact, use alternatives like "advanced the discussion", "shaped the discussion", or "provided critical input".

What is the difference between "contributed to discussion" and "contributed discussion"?

"Contributed to discussion" is the standard phrasing, indicating involvement. "Contributed discussion" is less common, suggesting the discussion itself was a contribution, which is not the typical intention.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

80%

Authority and reliability

3.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: