Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
contributed discussion
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "contributed discussion" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts where you want to refer to a discussion that has been added to or enhanced by contributions from various participants. Example: "The contributed discussion during the meeting helped clarify several key points."
Science
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
9 human-written examples
N.T. drafted the inital manuscript and all authors contributed discussion, writing and interpretation.
Science & Research
DHC contributed discussion.
Science
BSC contributed discussion.
Science
HJC contributed discussion.
Science
ESK contributed discussion.
Science
HTY contributed discussion.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
51 human-written examples
CW contributed discussions, and revised the manuscript.
Science
All authors contributed to discussion and writing.
Science & Research
B.H. and X.Z. also contributed to discussion and manuscript preparation.
Science & Research
All authors contributed through discussion and reviewed the manuscript.
Science & Research
All authors contributed to discussion, interpretation and writing.
Science & Research
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When referring to contributions in a formal context, consider using stronger verbs like "enhanced", "advanced", or "shaped" to describe the impact of the contribution more precisely.
Common error
Avoid using "contributed discussion" when you can specify the nature of the contribution (e.g., "provided critical analysis", "shared insightful observations").
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "contributed discussion" functions as a verb-noun combination, where "contributed" acts as a verb describing the action related to the noun "discussion". Ludwig AI flags it as non-standard. Examples in Ludwig show it describing an action of participating in a discussion.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "contributed discussion" is a less common way to express participation in a discussion, with Ludwig AI classifying the expression as not standard in written English. While grammatically acceptable, stronger and more specific verbs may be preferred for clearer communication. Its usage is primarily found within scientific contexts, although it can be adapted to various situations with appropriate adjustments. When writing, remember that specifying the nature of the contribution is more efficient than using a general phrasing. Consider related alternatives like "participated in the discussion" or "added to the discussion" for improved clarity.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
participated in the discussion
This alternative uses a more common and direct verb to describe involvement in a discussion.
added to the discussion
This phrase emphasizes the act of providing additional input or perspective to the discussion.
enhanced the discussion
This alternative highlights the positive impact of the contribution on the quality of the discussion.
advanced the discussion
This suggests that the contribution moved the discussion forward or brought it closer to a resolution.
furthered the discussion
Similar to "advanced the discussion", indicating progress was made because of the participation.
enriched the debate
Switches the term from 'discussion' to 'debate', adding a subtle layer of formality.
provided input to the discussion
This option focuses on the act of sharing thoughts or ideas as part of the discussion.
offered insights during the discussion
Highlights the sharing of valuable understandings, making the discussion more insightful.
shared perspectives in the discussion
Emphasizes different viewpoints being brought to the table during the debate.
played a part in the discussion
Suggests that the person had a significant role in the conversation without specifying how.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "contributed discussion" for clarity?
Consider using phrases like "participated in the discussion", "added to the discussion", or "enhanced the discussion" for greater clarity depending on the context.
Is "contributed discussion" grammatically correct?
While not incorrect, "contributed discussion" isn't the most common or idiomatic phrasing. It's more common to say someone "participated in the discussion" or "added to the discussion".
What are some stronger alternatives to "contributed discussion"?
For more impact, use alternatives like "advanced the discussion", "shaped the discussion", or "provided critical input".
What is the difference between "contributed to discussion" and "contributed discussion"?
"Contributed to discussion" is the standard phrasing, indicating involvement. "Contributed discussion" is less common, suggesting the discussion itself was a contribution, which is not the typical intention.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested