Sentence examples for contrast can be explained from inspiring English sources
Again, this contrast can be explained by differences in tissue tropism.
That contrast can be explained by two big count spikes on 1992 and 1994 that are not reflected in the trajectories predicted by both models.
When looking at CR values of the FLAIR and DIR sequences, their high values for lesion contrast can be explained by both the inversion pulses and MP: The high CR values for DIR are caused by the suppression of WM.
These contrasts can be explained as a result of: (1) local antecedent substrate variations and (2) the interplay of shelf physiography with Late Quaternary sea level fluctuations, which favoured changes in biological production and sediment flux as the palaeo-shoreline evolved from linear to complex during intermediate sea levels.
We have further explored this idea by asking whether simultaneous brightness contrast effects can be explained by the statistical relationship between the physical sources of the light reaching the retina and the corresponding luminance values in the retinal image.
Even though the number luminance (contrast) interactions can be explained in terms of a mapping at the magnitude representation level, alternative explanations for congruency effects in (for instance) Stroop paradigms have been proposed as well (e.g., Kornblum, Hasbroucq, & Osman, 1990; Pansky & Algom, 2002).
Metals in the two groups are shown to fall into two classes of core structure and behavior; the contrasting properties can be explained in terms of the γ-surfaces, and can be traced further to differences in the elastic constants.
Although, the fairly positive attitudes to maintenance 5-ASA therapy in contrast to steroids can be explained in terms of a lack of experienced side-effects or by differing routes of administration, negative attitudes to steroids were, nevertheless, less important when their necessity was deemed greater or when they were outweighed by their positive effects on the maintenance of usual activities.
The increase in probability for large-scale loops in contrast to small-scale loops can be explained on an intuitive basis: Starting from a linear chain, the diffusional process will bring monomers close together which are not so far away along the contour of the chain.
In contrast, 5.15% of FRR can be explained by the JAK2 GGCC risk haplotype which is present at lower frequency (27%; Supporting Information Table 4) in the general population.
