Interpretative repertoires acknowledge that variability, inconsistencies and contradictions occur within everyday discourses.
An egregious example of this contradiction occurred recently when someone associated with the Pentagon leaked a briefing paper branding Saudi Arabia an enemy of the United States.
The starkest example of that contradiction occurred on the very day that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared before the US Congress, implying the need for military action against Iran.
Of the hundreds of tweets that were sent out from men and women of Congress, a strange contradiction occurred: dozens who offered their condolences were indebted to gun manufacturers and the NRA to keep them in office.
We are unclear why this contradiction occurred.
When a contradiction is found, we verify that the trace contains a loop, which means that the contradiction occurred in the loop and is thus valid, else we know that we need to increase our approximation.
But something close to these casual self-contradictions occurs between men and women in all these scenes.
end{aligned} A contradiction occurs.
A contradiction occurs since (underline{phi}_{1}(xif>0) if −ξ is large.
Similarly, if u ¯ ≡ 0 and v ¯ ≢ 0, then a 2 > λ 1, κ 2. A contradiction occurs.
