The phrase "contradictions evident" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase in written English.
It can be used in various contexts to indicate that there are conflicting or opposing elements present. Example: The politician's speech was full of contradictions evident to anyone who was paying attention. In this sentence, the phrase "contradictions evident" is used to convey that the speaker's statements were inconsistent and could be easily noticed by anyone listening.
On both sides, however, there are double standards and the kind of contradiction evident in Khomeini's violation of the essential principles of his mentor, Mulla Sadra.
But failing to grasp the extraordinary contradiction evident in receiving Medicare benefits while simultaneously shouting nonsense about "government-run health care" is quite simply inexcusable.
These contradictions are evident in her small apartment.
Similar contradictions are evident in Kazakhstan's approach toward Europe as well.
The contradiction was evident several years ago, when the radio shockjock Don Imus lost his show for referring to the Rutgers women's basketball team as a bunch of "nappy-headed ho's".
Mr. Bush's delicate and sometimes awkward attempt to straddle this contradiction was evident when he quibbled with reporters who noted that he and his advisers had frequently said he would "restore honor" to the Oval Office, a clear assertion that this virtue had been lost.
A more basic - and consequential - contradiction is evident in Obama's currying of favor with King Salman of Saudi Arabia at time when the KAS actively opposes most American policies in the Middle East.
Perhaps nowhere was this contradiction more evident than in Trump's treatment of Venezuela, a country with a deeply inhumane government but one that poses no threat to U.S. security which is to say, a country the United States has absolutely no cause to attack.
In November, Nathan Heller wrote of "the contradictions and hypocrisies" evident in the biographies of powerful Silicon Valley company founders — that is, the tension between their idealistic rebellions against existing power structures and their reliance on those structures to get ahead.
