Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
There are three facts about the New York City subway that, when taken together, seem to lead to a contradiction: 1.
If there is a subsequence ( c n k ) k ∈ N ∗ → ∞, the choice ε = ε k = ( 1 + b ) c n k leads to the contradiction 1 ≤ a ( 1 + b ) α ψ ( ε k ) → 0. Therefore, the sequence ( c n ) is bounded.
Note that x 0 ≠ 0. Otherwise, we would obtain the following contradiction: 1 ≥ lim inf n ∥ x n ∥ = lim inf n ∥ x 0 + x n ∥ > σ − ε > a ≥ 1.
If we accept the aforementioned Law of Bivalence, that is, the principle according to which all sentences are either true or false, both alternatives lead to a contradiction: (1) is both true and false, that is, a dialetheia, contrary to the LNC.
Similar(56)
(13) From (12) and (13), we have the following contradiction: 1= Vert tilde{u}_{alpha_{n}} Vert + Vert tilde{v}_{alpha_{n}} Vert leq biglVert tilde{u}_{alpha_{n}}^ bigrVert + biglVert tilde{v}_{alpha_{n}}^ bigrVert + biglVert tilde{u}_{alpha_{n}}^ bigrVert + biglVert tilde{v}_{alpha_{n}}^ bigrVert to0 as (ntoinfty).
Hence, we have the contradiction ρ1 = ρ2.
If, we shall have a contradiction: (2.4).
Letting, we obtain the contradiction (3.5).
If, we reach the following contradiction: (3.22).
By Definition 2.1 this yields a contradiction (3.42).
For, by (3.6) we have the following contradiction: (3.16).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com