Sentence examples for contradicting interpretations from inspiring English sources

In many cases, comprehensive maps are one single person project requiring thoughtful design of the map's layout and resolving contradicting interpretations of biochemical experiments and points of view.

Field evidence relating the transmission intensity to the spread of drug resistance remains limited, with observations leading to contradicting interpretations [22] [24], [46], [47].

Controversies exist in every field of research and the authors have clearly made a note of it and have included the contradicting interpretations and conclusions from individual contributors to keep the reader informed about the limitations of current knowledge.

The introduction of the Nile perch into Lake Victoria was a very controversial issue and the assessment of its impact on the fishery has had very contradicting interpretations (see Kudhongania et. al, 1988).

Those mathematical calculations tracked vast amounts of time extending at least 7,000 years into the future; that detail was significant, because it contradicted interpretations that the Maya had predicted a 2012 apocalypse.

Another problem is that in the Grundlagen Frege announces his famous context principle, which on certain interpretations contradicts certain interpretations of compositionality; cf. section 1.6.4 above.

In it, she recreates the steps leading up to the fateful launch decision, contradicting conventional interpretations to prove that what occurred at NASA was not skulduggery or misconduct but a disastrous mistake.

Diane Vaughan recreates the steps leading up to that fateful decision, contradicting conventional interpretations to prove that what occurred at NASA was not skullduggery or misconduct but a disastrous mistake.

Contradicting conventional interpretations of African migration being essentially driven by poverty, violence and underdevelopment, increasing migration out of Africa seems rather to be driven by processes of development and social transformation which have increased Africans' capabilities and aspirations to migrate, a trend which is likely to continue in the future.

Although early objectors dismissed evolution as contradicting their interpretation of the Bible, this argument was legally invalidated when the Supreme Court ruled in Epperson v. Arkansas in 1968 that forbidding the teaching of evolution on religious grounds violated the Establishment Clause.

There may have been narrative exemplars contradicting the interpretation here, but they were not published.