The term "contractual party" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are referring to a person or entity involved in a legal agreement. For example: Both contractual parties agreed to the terms of the contract.
As regards information, the contractual parties have the obligation to make all information available to each other.
The first set represents the contractual parties that can include the provider, the end-user, the developer (Springoo resource requester), etc.
First, a barrier exists as it is not enough for two contractual parties to be able to contract, but parties also have to be invited to join the project.
This addition is necessary because the current definition does not assume the existence of an exclusive right where two undertakings are joint contractual parties to a service contract even if, owing to these rights, no other operators can obtain authorisation to operate services.
This linguistic uncertainty in standard form commercial contracts creates an opportunity for "contractual arbitrage": parties may argue, ex post, that the uncertainties in expression mean something that the contracting parties, ex ante, didn't contemplate.
One motive is that their contractual counter parties-buyers, lessors, and lenders - require that they carry insurance.
Rather, private keys are a modality to effectuate the parties' contractual agreements..
This dispute may also be unique because of the provisions rejiggering the parties' contractual relationship in the case eBay starts a competitive business.
The economic incentive here, absent the parties' contractual and moral obligations, is to walk away from the deal (or for the banks to just pay that amount to rue21, halving their loss).
Constitutional rights are not absolute — free speech does not extend to obscenity, for instance — and since marriage is a contractual relationship both parties must be in a legal and mental position to agree to it.
