Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
Continuing on our current path is expensive, ineffective and inhumane.
By 2100, their calculations suggest, continuing on our current path would mean locking in a long-term sea level rise of 23 feet, but aggressive emission cuts could limit that to seven feet.
Similar(55)
To continue on our current path because the alternative seems like too much effort is not just shortsighted.
"If we continue on our current path, the world may face a 40% shortfall in water availability by 2030.
We know that if we continue on our current path of allowing emissions to rise year after year, climate change will change everything about our world.
If we want our state to be riddled with the homogenized, sheetrocked, "inflatable" tract housing that has littered the natural landscape across the lower 48 in recent days, then we should continue on our current path to visual hell.
After urging people to overcome political correctness, Kelly said: "The other reason that we need to have this debate is that, if we continue on our current path, we know what the future will be.
Even if the lower 'instrumental' estimates were right and climate sensitivity is closer to 2°C, that would still suggest that we're headed for about 3.5°C warming by 2100 if we continue on our current path.
Some of the headline findings: "If we continue on our current path, by 2050 between $66bn and $106bn worth of existing coastal property will likely be below sea level nationwide, with $238bn to $507bn worth of property below sea level by 2100".
The IPCC warns that if we want to avoid very dangerous climate change, we're on track to blow through our allowed carbon budget in as little as two to three decades if we continue on our current path of relying on fossil fuels.
As these figure below from the report also illustrates, about 70% of studies indicate that crop yields will decline as the Earth continues to warm after 2030, with a high chance that yields could decline by 25% or more by the end of the century if we continue on our current path.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com