Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Six of 25 patients were randomised, two in the IM continuation arm and four in the interruption arm.
Similar(59)
Hyperlipidemia led to treatment withdrawal in 1 patient in the PI-continuation arm.
At week 28, the LSM reduction in triglycerides was significantly greater in the abacavir-switch arm than the PI-continuation arm (-134 vs -36 mg/dL, P = 0.019).
Of 104 patients enrolled in the study, 52 were randomized to the abacavir-switch arm and 52 to the PI-continuation arm.
Cumulative coronary artery risk factors in the PI-continuation arm: 0 factors = 26; 1 factor = 12; 2 factors = 13; and 3 factors = 1.
The LSM LDL-cholesterol level at week 28 was 133 mg/dL in the abacavir-switch arm and 153 mg/dL in the PI-continuation arm (P = 0.016).
New adverse events in the PI-continuation arm were not expected as patients had been stabilized on this treatment for >3 months.
In the ITT analysis, the abacavir-switch arm experienced greater reductions in total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol than the PI-continuation arm over the entire study period, with differences between treatment arms being statistically significant from week 8 onward.
A higher proportion of patients in the abacavir-switch arm had decreases in the triglyceride toxicity grade as compared to the PI-continuation arm, whereas a lower proportion in the abacavir-switch arm had increases in triglyceride toxicity grade.
In the SF-36, the week 28 QOL scores did not differ between treatment arms for most domains, except Vitality (in favor of the PI-continuation arm; P = 0.042) and Health (in favor of the abacavir-switch arm; P = 0.013).
At week 28, the abacavir-switch arm had significantly greater least square mean reduction from baseline in total cholesterol (-42 vs -10 mg/dL, P < 0.001), LDL-cholesterol (-14 vs +5 mg/dL, P = 0.016), and triglycerides (-134 vs -36 mg/dL, P = 0.019) than the PI-continuation arm, with no differences in HDL-cholesterol (+0.2 vs +1.3 mg/dL, P = 0.583).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com