Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Each contiguous dot subset would provide information about the local contour attributes of the shape.
Shape-relevant contour attributes are delivered directly by the contiguous dot subsets, but they could be provided by random subsets only through aggregation.
Similar(58)
The panels of Fig. 2 illustrate four subsets of contiguous dots sampled from the display set that is shown in Fig. 1.
The contiguous-dot subsets reflect the local contour attributes of the frog, whereas the random-dot subsets do not.
A spaced array of dots was used to mark the outside boundary of namable objects, and subsets were chosen that contained either contiguous strings of dots or randomly positioned dots.
The present goal was to examine whether contiguous subsets of dots would be more effective at eliciting recognition of shapes than would subsets having an equal number of dots that were randomly chosen from the full inventory of dots.
For the present experiment, the subsets provided either contiguous sequences of four dots, or four dots chosen at random locations in the boundary.
This statistical analysis found no significant difference (p = 0.59) in recognition rate for the proximity condition, i.e., recognition of shapes was not different as a function of whether the subset dots were contiguous or were at randomly selected positions.
Having the inductions and dot probe blocks contiguous in time without breaks for assessing affective self-report influences of the inductions was essential for maintaining the carry over effects of the inductions to the threat vigilance task.
The four-dot array of the contiguous subsets spanned 35 arc' for horizontal or vertical alignments, and 47 arc' for diagonal alignments.
There were two levels of the proximity condition, requiring either that the dots of the subset be contiguous, or that they be randomly selected from among the members of the display set.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com