The Walt & Gilson's "Policy Triangle Framework" provided guidance as themes were categorized into content, context, actors, and process.
An analytical framework which combines the policymaking context, actors, process, content, power (Walt 1994) and the role of evidence in policymaking (Court and Young 2006) was developed.
The interviews showed that four core concepts i.e. context, actors, HIA principles and policies and HIA capacities influence HIA practice in Iran.
We use the policy triangle analysis methodology [ 7] to examine Russia's tobacco control policy content, context, actors and processes in a conceptual framework.
A topic guide was initially formulated using the policy analysis triangle focusing on the policy content, context, actors, and policy processes [ 28].
This study demonstrates and supports observations that even though the content of a programme is generally acceptable, a favourable context, actors' roles, and wider implications of the design on actors' interests explain decisions concerning adoption.
The policy analysis approach of Walt [ 37, 88] was also drawn upon so that the factors influencing each stage of the reform process were categorised and analysed according to four broad factors: context, actors, process and content.
This gap could be filled by undertaking political economy analysis in the field of HRH, which analyses the influence the context, actors and processes have on each other in policy-making [ 11].
This was followed by the development of codes and categories, a process that was guided by the elements of the Walt and Gilson policy analysis framework (content, context, actors, and process) [ 25], as well as the case study approach.
The interviews followed a semistructured, open-ended format and was structured to explore the context, actors, process, content, power and the use of evidence in both (a) national vector control policy decisions and (b) in the planned scale-up of larviciding.
