From the received message, C decrypted contents are formulated as frac{Cleft|equiv varPhi (CARSID right.,C,{S}_1mathbf{ni}y}{Cleft|equiv varPhi {left{ CASIDright}}_yright.}left {R}_1,{R}_2right).}left {R}_1
From the received message, S2 decrypted contents are formulated as frac{{mathrm{S}}_2left|equiv right.varPhi left( CASID, UIDright),{mathrm{S}}_2mathbf{ni}-{mathrm{K}}_1}{{mathrm{S}}_2left|equiv right.varPhi left{{left{ CASIDright}}_{K 1},{left{UIDright}}_{K 1}right}}left({mathrm{R}}_1, {mathrm{R}}_2right).
From the received message, S2 decrypted contents are formulated as frac{{mathrm{S}}_2left|equiv varPhi right.left{ fingerprintkern0.5em status,; CARSIDright};{mathrm{S}}_2,;{mathrm{S}}_1mathbf{ni}x}{{mathrm{S}}_2left|equivarPhihi right.left{ fingerprintkern0.5em status,; CARSIDright}left._xright}}left({mathrm{R}}_1,{mathrm{R}}_2right).
From the received message, C decrypted contents are formulated as frac{mathrm{C}left|equiv varPhi right.left( CASID, wright),;mathrm{C},;{mathrm{S}}_1mathbf{ni}u}{mathrm{C}left|equiv varPhi right.{left{ CASID, wright}}_u}left({mathrm{R}}_1, {mathrm{R}}_2right).
From the received message, S1 decrypted contents are formulated as frac{{mathrm{S}}_1left|equiv right.varPhi left(hleft(PWD*right),;{left{UIDright}}_{K 1,}uright),{mathrm{S}}_1mathbf{ni}-mathrm{K}}{{mathrm{S}}_1left|equiv right.varPhi left{left{hleft(PWD*right),;{left{UIDright}}_{K 1,}uright}_Kright}}left({mathrm{R}}_1,{mathrm{R}}_2right).
From the received message, S1 decrypted contents are formulated as frac{{mathrm{S}}_1left|equiv varPhi right.left( BASID,;h(PWD),;vright),;{mathrm{S}}_1mathbf{ni}-mathrm{K}}{{mathrm{S}}_1left|equiv varPhi right.left{{left{ BASID,kern0.5em h(PWD),;vright}}_{+K}right}}left({mathrm{R}}_1, {mathrm{R}}_2right).
Questions and content were formulated by an ED physician (SMF), reviewed by two independent EPs for face and content validity, and translated by a bilingual, native Portuguese-speaking ED nurse (HL).
The latency for the retrieval of content is formulated, which is pertinent to the caching capability of the domain, the efficiency of the used hash function and the size of the domain.
The specific content is formulated based on earlier research and focus interviews in each site.
Two isoproteic and isocaloric diets differing in lipid content were formulated and prepared as explained previously (Karanth et al., 2009).
Four isoproteic (41% crude protein) diets differing in FA composition and lipid content were formulated (Table 1).
