Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
Defined gene content of the transcriptome: JLJ, LL, AVKu.
The GC content of the transcriptome was 63.2%.
The GC content of the transcriptome was 64.93 %.
The total GC content of the transcriptome was found to be 43.44%.
This increased ranking was coordinated over many motifs and could reflect a general response to GC content of the transcriptome.
The GC content of the transcriptome data of grain aphid was 39.45%, a value slightly higher than that of the pea aphid which was 38.8% [ 1].
Similar(52)
The overall GC content of the transcriptomes was 32.2%, 34.1% and 33.2% in S. lineatus, S. mimosarum and S. tentoriicola, respectively, while in defined coding regions (see below) the GC content was slightly higher (approximately 40% in all three species) compared to the overall GC content.
The GC content of the Heliconius transcriptome is derived from 1.627 contigs.
The GC content of microsatellites was correlated with GC content of the entire transcriptome of each genus, but the correlation diminished for short motifs with two mismatches, where the recognized microsatellite loci were longer.
This work provides a comprehensive study of the miRNA content of the barley transcriptome and we hope that it serves as a foundation for future, more targeted, studies of individual barley miRNAs and their function.
The GC content of the olive transcriptome assembled in this study ranged from 15.4 to 76.2% in the different unigenes, with an average of 40.4%, very similar to that of 42.5% reported previously.
More suggestions(15)
content of the representation
content of the response
content of the policy
content of the lesson
content of the model
content of the word
content of the music
content of the environment
content of the programme
content of the publication
content of the experiment
content of the study
content of the bulk
content of the sentence
content of the session
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com