Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
Soil organic carbon stocks in the soil profiles were calculated as follows (Batjes 1996): Td = sumlimits_{i = 1}^{k} {rho iPiDi,,left( {1 - Si} right)}, (1 where Td = SOC stocks over depth (d) of layer (Mg m−2), ρi = BD of layer i (Mg m−3), Pi = C content of layer i (mg C g−1 soils), Di = thickness of layer i (m), and Si = percentage of rock fragment particles >2 mm in layer i.
Given the homogeneous artifact content of layer 2, the discrepancy between the samples for 2a and 2b was in turn considered to be a byproduct of the residual presence of recent Holocene material in the 2a bulk bone sample.
Similar(58)
Include full content of layers, in the final codestream.
Algorithm 1 includes first the full content of layers, in the final codestream.
It can be found through comparing those 4 acquired water content profiles that water bearing of near-surface overburden strata basically has 3 layers, i.e. water content of surface layer (0 2 m) is low, and water contents of middle layer (2 8 m) and deep layer (8 15 m) fluctuate due to coal mining.
From this perspective, high Vp/Vs with moderate Vp and low Vs in the middle layer may indicate smaller aspect ratio of water content of this layer compared to that of the top layer.
Figure 7 Photocurrent-voltage characteristic curves of DSSCs with various contents of layered α-TiP.
The multi-layered structure and content of each layer is illustrated and listed in Figure 1.
The water content profile indicates that water content of surface layer is low, and that of middle layer is 12 % 18%%, which indicates a good water content, and that of deep layer is 8 % 10%%, which is a little bit lower than that of middle layer.
The water content of anodic layer should increase according to the pH and layer thickness and decrease on increasing the applied potential.
Water content of surface layer was lower, while that of middle and deep layers increased compared to profiles of second acquisition.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com