Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(11)
This is not infrequent, because any time we discuss the content of a presentation, describing its characteristics and its relations to other things, we are presenting it.
If all this is intuitive, why are the object and the content of a presentation conflated?
A major difference concerns the role of the content of a presentation and its ontological status, since for a Brentanian the content of a presentation can only be something actually existing in one's mind.
When we combine a subject- and a predicate-term we just form a more complex idea which is again the content of a presentation.
Consequently, Twardowski construes the notion of dependence of the parts of an object in terms of modes of presentability of the parts of an object, i.e. as existence of the parts of the content of a presentation (which always exists).
Twardowski saw that notions such as 'the object of a presentation' and 'immanent object' were ambiguous because in Brentano's writings the object of a presentation was identified with that of content of a presentation (Twardowski 1926, 10).
Similar(49)
The number of learning contents of a presentation was divided by the duration of the presentation and defined as learning load (LL).
Remember some information (for example, the contents of a presentation).
The content of an industry presentation is also different.
A sceneflow is a hierarchical scenario with nodes that structure content of an interactive presentation and edges that specify how this content is linked together.
The distinction between content and object of a presentation was not new in Twardowski's time.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com