A robust 3D subjective test requires 10 to 14 sequences, because of the additional factors introduced (e.g., motion direction, depth of field, disparity, and unique 3D content interactions).
Although plate angle had no significant impact on the protein content, interactions with air flow rate, plate voltage and tribo-charger tube length were found to have a significant influence on the protein separation efficiency.
However, as shown, a single sentence may instantiate different structures with different regulatory content (interactions).
Think Minority Report-like data and content interaction, and you get the general idea.
Panel a shows the venous CO2 content evolution over the time (mixed model: group vs. venous CO2 content interaction, P = 0.230; timepoint vs. venous CO2 content interaction, P < 0.001; timepoint vs. group interaction, P < 0.001).
Panel b shows the arterial CO2 content changes over time (mixed model: group vs. arterial CO2 content interaction, P = 0.231; timepoint vs. arterial CO2 content interaction, P < 0.001; timepoint vs. group interaction, P < 0.001).
The students moved linearly through "home screen --> theory --> learning content (tab wise) introductory text --> learninteraction interaction".
Panel d shows the effluent CO2 content changes over time (mixed model: group vs. effluent CO2 content interaction, P = 0.769; timepoint vs. effluent CO2 content interaction, P = 0.136; timepoint vs. group interaction, P = 0.242), for the effluent CO2 content, the baseline data were excluded.
In addition, no time of sampling over day by dietary forage or CP content interaction on fecal E.coli O157 H7 or Listeria level was observed.
The eGBR differed between real-world and non-sense object stimuli only if a speeded response was required (TIME PRESSURE×SEMANTIC CONTENT interaction: F1,16 = 5.00, p = 0.039, real-world vs. non-sense object effect for delayed responses: t16 = -0.77, p = 0.449, real-world vs. non-sense object effect for speeded responses: t16 = 2.29, p = 0.035).
However, recognition related modulations of late total gamma activity were only observed for the more detailed images from stimulus Set B (LEVEL OF DETAIL×SEMANTIC CONTENT interaction: F1,16 = 5.11, p = 0.038, real-world vs. non-sense objects effect for stimulus Set A: t16 = −0.80, p = 0.438, real-world vs. non-sense objects effect for stimulus Set B: t16 = 2.65, p = 0.017).
