Key components of how contamination was prevented, what legal process was applied, where artifacts were located, who performed the processing, and what tools were used are examples of how these keywords would be used in the reporting process.
Carryover contamination was prevented as described by KWOK & HIGUCHI [ 28].
Using this protocol any possible genomic DNA contamination was prevented [see Additional file 1].
Carryover contamination was prevented by the strict implementation of the unidirectional flow from pre-amplification to post-amplification areas, with only sealed tubes and racks travelling down the workflow [ 10].
Carry-over tissue contamination was prevented by cleaning the blade with 96% ethanol after sectioning each sample; negative controls were sectioned first, followed by test blocks and positive control blocks.
Using a similar design in a call center nurses project, contamination was prevented using the following strategies: a) using a private room for simulated calls; and b) requesting that nurses not share or discuss decision support resources or approaches with others.
Microbial and fungal contaminations were prevented by adding sodium azide 0.5 mM.
Contamination of ancient samples by modern Y. pestis DNA and cross-contamination were prevented in our experiments.
Cross-contamination was prevented from all DNA extractions and template handling by wiping down the laboratory bench and BSCII with a 1 20 dilution of Trigene® Advance followed by UV radiation for 20 minutes.
