Sentence examples for contact conformation from inspiring English sources

This mutant was designed to test whether contact conformation, rather than the resulting short structural branchpoint distance, is important for splicing.

The only exception is mutant rps17b-S2, which does not have any suboptimal structures with contact conformation, but still exhibits a short structural branchpoint distance (most of the suboptimal predictions have d s = 10).

Four mutants that are predicted to have reduced splicing were designed not to have any structures with contact conformation or otherwise short structural branchpoint distances (these mutants are labeled with letter 'L', which stands for long d s ).

Four mutants that are predicted to splice efficiently were designed to have multiple suboptimal structures with contact conformation and short average structural branchpoint distance (these mutants are labeled with letter 'S', which stands for short d s ).

The efficient splicing of mutant rps17b-S2, whash hashortrt structural branchpoint distance (d s = 10) without contact conformation in many of the predicted structures, suggests that a specific structural arrangement between the donor site and the branchpoint sequence is not required for efficient splicing.

Some large contact conformations were particularly stable; 8.5% of the rules were associated with an average contact surface that included more than 20% of the residues and where the standard deviation was less than 5%.

To probe the limits of fluorescence molecular imaging, these advances have been combined in a state-of-the-art fluorescence tomography (FT) system, employing the ultimate sensitivity of single photon counting and information-rich time-domain light detection in an easy-to-use non-contact conformation [ 31].

Let { a1i,b1i }, i = 1, N1 be the set of ordered pairs of residue numbers corresponding to residues, a1i from domain A, and b1i from domain B, making a contact in conformation 1.

As published, the structure contains a 2.6 Å C⋯C contact, the conformation of one of the C =O)—O C groups is unusual, the maximum Mogul z-score is 6.5, there is some preferred orientation and the publication describes problems with a possible phase transition taking place during the diffraction measurements.

It is apparent that THC can adopt different contact-forming conformations depending on context.

Studies in E. coli have shown that different Crp mutations can prevent transcription activation at a numbers of Crp-dependent promoters and suggested that Crp can use different contacts and/or conformations during transcription at promoters with different architectures [ 19, 20].