Sentence examples for consumption for men from inspiring English sources

The chart below shows fruit and vegetable consumption for men, women and children.

Multiple imputation using all predictors plus the outcome variable was used to replace missing values for alcohol consumption for men.

See table 1 for range (g/day) of quarters of fried food consumption for men and for women.

This is the upper cut-off point for low-risk (for chronic harm) alcohol consumption for men [ 46].

Lifestyle factors, including educational level, income status and tea drinking may be associated with sexual activity for women and occupational status and alcohol consumption for men.

One might hypothesise therefore that price-related motivations and perceptions could provide a double-hit with regard to SES differences in fruit consumption for men, but analyses did not find value for money ratings mediating this relationship for men.

For the present analysis, alcohol consumption was classified into three categories: no alcohol consumption (0 g/day), moderate alcohol consumption (0.1-39.9 for men and 0.1-19.9 for women) and heavy alcohol consumption (≥ 40 g/day for men and ≥ 20 g/day for women) following previous studies regarding cardiovascular and all-cause mortality [ 1, 32].

We additionally assessed the overall drinking status (drinkers v non-drinker) of study subjects, the study specific top tertile of alcohol consumption (separately for men and women), and history of binge drinking (for details see supplementary methods 2.1).

For subsequent analyses, a median split on fortnightly alcohol consumption, separately for men and women, was performed to create a heavy versus light drinking group, as in Nederkoorn et al. (2009).

HbA1c concentrations according to the combination of bilirubin and coffee use are shown in Table 3. High bilirubin was consistently associated with lower concentrations of HbA1c regardless of coffee consumption except for men consuming ≥ 4 cups of coffee per day.

By contrast, heavy alcohol consumption increased for men (2.0 %), the largest change being among those in the lowest education levels (i.e., by 3.1 % for those with a lower secondary or a primary education and by 5.4%% -significant at 10%% level only- for those without any qualification), increasing educational level inequalities.