Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Again, subjects who regularly consumed snack foods were monitored going about their everyday lives.
This eating habit is commonplace [ 5] and likely to add calories to a person's total daily energy intake if the consumed snack food has little impact on satiety, resulting in poor adjusted intake at their next meal(s).
The clinching argument comes from the way Pepsi views its market: two-thirds of the time people consume snacks and drinks together.
In 2010 an Insee survey found that 40% of under-25s consume snacks – crisps and chocolate bars – during the day, compared with half that number among the over-60s.
Peter Curran investigates our compulsion to consume snacks and movies at the same time.
For example, in the study by Cranston et al. (19) there was an absolute requirement for participants to consume snacks between meals and at bedtime together with reduction in insulin doses.
Foods that could conceivably be consumed as snacks (snack-type foods) were identified from the FFQ and it included fruits, vegetables, yoghurts, nuts, crisps, cakes, biscuits, chocolate, ice-cream and sweets.
There was also tremendous variability in the amount of phosphate consumed with snacks ranging from 0 to 463 mg per snack with some patients consuming 3 snacks in 1 day.
Furthermore, physical activity (PA) may confound the associations between snacking and adiposity – for example, sedentary behaviour has been positively associated with consumption of energy-dense snacks and inversely associated with fruit and vegetable consumption, both of which may be consumed as snacks.
Changes in snacking habits in developed countries are a growing cause for concern, since foods and beverages commonly consumed as snacks, tend to be both energy dense and nutrient poor.
Also, more children who consumed cariogenic snacks between meals three times a day or more were ECC free compared with children who consumed cariogenic snacks in-between meals less than three times a day (70.8 % vs 29.2 %; p = 0.01).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com