Your English writing platform
Discover Ludwig"consume breakfast" is not correct and does not typically occur in written English.
The more common and correct way to phrase this would be "have breakfast" or "eat breakfast." Here is an example of each: - Incorrect: I need to consume breakfast before leaving for work. - Correct: I need to have breakfast before leaving for work. - Incorrect: She consumes breakfast quickly in the morning. - Correct: She eats breakfast quickly in the morning.
Exact(14)
The slow chewing means that it can take 50 minutes to consume breakfast, often accompanied by coughing.
"People who consume breakfast on a regular basis have a lower risk of cardiovascular disease," Dr. Marie-Pierre St-Onge, the author of the statement and a researcher at Columbia University Medical Center, told CBS News.
This feedback may encourage the person to consume breakfast is they have not done so when they view this feedback.
Participants were required to consume breakfast and dinner at the Pennington Center.
Breakfast was defined according to Alexander: "Subjects who did not consume breakfast on both days were categorised as breakfast skippers.
An important finding was that 30% of these school students in Delhi did not consume breakfast daily.
Similar(46)
These reviews and studies published more recently have indicated that breakfast consumption is frequently associated with higher energy and nutrient intakes, and that the overall nutrient profile appears most favourable among those who consume breakfasts that include ready-to-eat cereal (RTEC).
Using a randomized crossover design, 15 subjects consumed breakfast meals containing 60% of energy as fat.
Young adults who placed high importance on alternative food production practices also consumed breakfast approximately 1 more day per week and fast food half as often as those who placed low importance on these practices (P<0.001).
Breakfast consumption was associated with greater physical activity vs. those who never consumed breakfast.
More 8th graders consumed breakfast daily vs.10th graders (72.3% vs. 67.0%; p<0.05).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com