Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Indeed, a majority of the GPs found most of the examined aspects of sickness absence consultations problematic.
About one third of the physicians found sickness certification consultations problematic at least once a week (32 %) and very or fairly problematic to handle (39%%).
In summary, about a third (31.7 %) of the physicians found sickness certification consultations problematic at least once a week and found them very or fairly problematic to handle (39%%).
Similar(57)
Physicians working in primary health care (PHC) had the highest proportions experiencing sickness certification consultations as problematic at least once a week (49.5 %) and as very or fairly problematic (56.6 %), followed by physicians working in psychiatry, pain management, or orthopaedics.
The proportions who experienced sickness certification consultations as problematic at least once weekly (i.e., frequency) and as very or fairly problematic (i.e., extent) were highest among physicians working in PHC (49.5 and 56.6 %, respectively), followed by physicians working in psychiatry, pain management, or orthopaedics (Fig. 1).
The study confirms that many GPs experience sickness absence consultations as problematic.
A large proportion (87.3%) of the psychiatrists experienced sickness certification consultations as problematic at least a few times per year.
Our results indicate that those physicians also to a great extent experience sickness-certification consultations as problematic.
Previous studies have indicated that GPs experience several tasks and situations related to sickness certification consultations as problematic.
Participants expressed the view that intervening with overweight or obese infants during non-routine or illness consultations was problematic for a number of reasons.
The physicians at a vast majority of the clinics regarded sickness-certification consultations as problematic and far more so among physicians in PHC in spite of that they did not have as many such consultations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com