Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Similar(60)
Read codes were converted into GPRD medcodes in order to identify consultations in the database.
All historical consultations in the database were reviewed and each was retrospectively assigned to one of these 20 primary topic categories.
Total visit duration was timed in seconds for all videotaped consultations in the database.
In addition, the analyses of prescribing patterns between physician categories cover 88% of all consultations in the database.
Our analyses were conducted on 512 consultations (121 in the first period, 391 in the second period) and we specified whether psychological (N = 185), social (N = 62) or physical (N = 265) symptoms were presented by patients during these consultations by using the International Classification for Primary Care (ICPC) codes that were available for all consultations in the database.
Stick to the database.
Add data to the database.
An accepted standard for determination of variant pathogenicity (with or without consultation of the databases described above) has not emerged, although several have been proposed.
Information pertaining to consultations is entered into the database by bioethics staff (see Table 1 for time-based and descriptive variables analyzed).
Access to the consultation database is limited to bioethics staff, Committee members, and individuals participating in bioethics training.
statement to create the database.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com