Suggestions(1)
Exact(28)
Among participants who completed follow-up questionnaires at six months, 80/104 (77%) in the intervention group and 68/86 (79%) in the control group had consulted their GP since the baseline consultation (p = 0.7).
Acceptance was associated significantly with older age (P <.0001), higher parity (P <.0001), higher education (P =.002), husband's occupation (P =.006), obstetric consultation (P <.0001), previous teaching encounters (P =.0006), recognition of the students' roles (P =.004), and satisfaction with clinical service (P = 0.01).
Those with a BA degree or less in any field (low education) reported a statistically significant greater need for training in home visits/coaching and consultation (p ≤ .05) and working with families/family systems (p ≤ .001) than those with a BA degree or higher (high education).
Significant associations were found between the caries experience index (dmf-t) and the reason for the last consultation (p = 0.011).
There was no association between owning a webcam and willingness to have a webcam consultation (p = 0.30).
No significant differences between groups were observed for how patients rated their general health prior to the consultation (p = 0.12).
Similar(32)
Additionally, insulin use was also associated with higher expenditures in medical consultations (p = 0.005), nursing consultations (p = 0.001) and overall public healthcare expenditures (p = 0.001).
Consultations of less than ten minutes' length had significantly lower scores than longer consultations (p < 0.001).
The overall mean number of third-party consultations was significantly higher in the AD cohort than for GOA patients (17.0 vs. 9.7 overall third-party consultations; p < .0001).0001
Characteristically, these patients were older (p = 0.004), had more consultations (p = 0.05), and had a long history of symptoms (p = 0.06).
There were no significant differences between the groups in the costs related to specialist consultations (p = 0.949) and radiography (p = 0.162).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com