Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The manuscript was improved by constructive reviewer comments.
Similar(59)
Two anonymous reviewers provided constructive criticism.
The authors are grateful to Mr. Wen-Hong Lin for the fine line drawings, to Prof. Chun-Rui Lin IBKK) and Prof. Yu-Song Huang (IBK) for their assistance in the field, to Miss Jie Huang (IBK) for the help of molecular analysis, to two reviewers for constructive reviewers.
We are very grateful to all the reviewers, whose constructive reviews made the success of this special issue possible and ensured the high quality of this special issue.
We thank three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments, especially reviewer 1.
While both of the reviewers agree that this is a very interesting study, the authors need to appropriately address the reviewers' constructive comments before the manuscript is acceptable.
The authors would like to acknowledge the helpful and constructive comments from reviewers.
We appreciate the reviewers' constructive suggestions.
We appreciate the insightful and constructive comments from reviewers and editors.
The authors also greatly appreciate the brilliant and constructive inputs from reviewers and participants of the International Conference on Intelligent Biology and Medicine (ICIBM 2014).
We also point to minor changes we did to correct lapses and omissions, based on some of the reviewers' constructive suggestions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com