Sentence examples for construction of technologies from inspiring English sources

Faced with the seemingly limitless qualities of the brain, neuroscience has eschewed provincialism and instead pursued a broad tack that openly draws on insights from biology, physics, chemistry, engineering, psychology and mathematics in its construction of technologies and theories with which to probe and understand the brain.

Although the more 'upstream' post-ELSI approaches to iGEM HP invite reflection on the sociotechnical construction of technologies, the focus remains on the product over enquiry into everyday scientific practice.

The theory of social construction of technology (SCOT) and the theory of technological paradigms (TTP) are normally regarded as competing or even incompatible perspectives on technological change.

The SCOT (social construction of technology) approach [13] is a complementary approach to the LTS theory.

Social construction of technology (SCoT), in turn, studies the interaction between humans and technology and how human action shapes technology [8].

Yet the social construction of technology, its uses and its innovations, nonetheless warns us that we can't expect new technology alone to be a panacea for the issues we all face in the 21st century.

The aim of this study is to determine the views of pre-service classroom teachers about nature of technology, the relationship between technology and science, the relationship between technology and society, and social construction of technology.

This article explores the challenges, advantages and limitations of the pro-active use of the social construction of technology (SCOT) to improve the methods applied in the development of technology for use by a broad range of actors.

New methods developed to analyze the social construction of technology attempt to move the debate from questions like 'does technology drive history?' to arguments about a mutual relationship between technological and social change.

This paper develops theories of path-dependency, social construction of technology, and actor-networks to analyse the historical development of the Ethiopian Sorghum Improvement Program (ESIP), a long-running and sophisticated public-sector effort whose outputs have had limited adoption.

Using a social construction of technology approach, the article attempts to deconstruct the implementation and delivery of LIS in Medellin, Colombia and analyse how empowering and disempowering discourses form through relationships between institutions and citizens laden with social and economic inequality.