Exact(1)
Better contact constraint scoring functions, which more evenly weight contact constraints according to both sequence separation and neighbourhood density, are needed to deal with this problem.
Similar(59)
P.N. and K.E.S. performed constraint score analyses.
Linear constraint scores were plotted for each mutant.
We compare CCLS with unsupervised Laplacian score, as well as supervised constraint score, constrained Laplacian score, Spec, and ReliefF.
Features are selected through minimizing this constraint score, with maximizes class separability.
These include spectral feature selection (Spec) [27], ReliefF [28], Laplacian score, constraint score, and constrained Laplacian score.
Constraint score is a supervised feature selection algorithm [9] which requires a relatively small amount of labeled data.
The constraint score approach selects features based on a small amount of labeled data but ignores unlabeled data.
It can be seen that the performance of CCLS is significantly better than that of Spec, Laplacian score, constraint score, and constrained Laplacian score.
CLS combines Laplacian score to represent the internal structure characteristics of the entire data space and constraint score to incorporate class separability of the labeled data.
Filter methods use scores or confidences to evaluate the importance of features in the learning tasks and include algorithms such as Laplacian score (LS) [8], constraint score (CS) [9], and constrained Laplacian score (CLS) [10, 11].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com