What secret knowledge, one must wonder, is breathed into lawyers when they become Justices of this Court, that enables them to discern that a practice which the text of the Constitution does not clearly proscribe, and which our people have regarded as constitutional for 200 years, is in fact unconstitutional?
The mandate is constitutional for two reasons, says the government.
The overarching one, of course, is whether it is constitutional for the federal government to deny benefits to some people who are legally married under their state's laws.
So the states are not questioning the legality of mandates but whether it is constitutional for the federal government to foist one on state governments.
The case before the court is whether it is constitutional for the federal government to penalize people who fail to buy health insurance.
It is entirely appropriate and constitutional for us to continue to identify those rights, even personal rights, that we the people believe are worth protecting.
Fisher v. Texas, which the Supreme Court will decide this month, concerns whether it's constitutional for the University of Texas at Austin to consider race in admissions.
Apart from whether it is free-speech respecting or constitutional for various authorities to throw everything they've got at WikiLeaks, is it even smart?
Mr. Cacheris said today that he did not think that it was constitutional for the government to seek the death penalty in the Hanssen case.
The high court ruled that it was not constitutional for the government to trigger article 50 without a vote by MPs.
"If it was constitutional for lawmakers to expand the voting period to 35 days, it must also be constitutional for the same legislative body to amend the timeframe to 28 days, a timeframe that remains one of the most generous in the nation," Husted said in a written statement.
