'constitutional' is a correct and commonly used word in written English
It can be used in various contexts, but it typically refers to something related to a constitution, the fundamental laws and principles that govern a country or organization. Example: The new bill was subject to a constitutional review to ensure that it did not violate the rights and freedoms outlined in the country's constitution.
Nursultan Nazarbayev has led Kazakhstan as president, since independence in 1991, extending his tenure through a series of constitutional revisions and elections in which he has faced only token opposition.
He said the Lords would be most difficult for the government on constitutional issues such as the Human Rights Act and Scottish devolution.
School districts in other states have brought similar lawsuits summoning constitutional language to demand increased funding and awaited the Kansas ruling as a legal guidepost.
In 1979, after bitter rows with Hume over the involvement of Dublin in fresh constitutional talks, Fitt resigned the SDLP leadership.
Now she asserted her constitutional right to take over the running of the country, and got the military top brass – themselves concerned with the direction Malawi was taking – to support her. Banda's inauguration as president in April 2012 was a turning point for Malawi.
She'd been frozen out of the ruling party, and Mutharika had tried to fire her several times, but she'd clung on for dear life to her constitutional mandate.
But she said the outright denial was exacerbated at Chicago's secretive interrogation and holding facility: "It's very, very rare for anyone to experience their constitutional rights in Chicago police custody, and even more so at Homan Square," Solowiej said.
However, Lord O'Donnell, the former cabinet secretary who was intimately involved in the 2010 negotiations, said the key constitutional requirement for a prime minister is simply the ability to command the confidence of the House of Commons.
The European convention on human rights and fundamental freedoms (to give it its full title), as scheduled in the Human Rights Act 1998, is an outcrop of the international law of human rights, and is not, other than remotely, derived from the ancient event of our constitutional history at Runnymede 800 years ago.
It excludes anyone who could lend a modicum of diversity to these debates; who might challenge the status quo on the environment, on devolution, on constitutional change, on free-market economics, on gender politics.
Decentralisation will be a key part of constitutional reform, but it remains unclear what form it will take.
