Sentence examples for constitutes a scientific from inspiring English sources

To the authors knowledge no studies have yet considered the relationship between specific surface area related elution velocity and physical media characteristics, which constitutes a scientific gap.

But the thing you should not be doing is following others' successes to the letter on the cod-understanding that that constitutes a scientific approach.

He constructs a new concept of reductive explanation based on his own idea of what effectively constitutes a scientific theory and his unificationist account of scientific explanation (1989).

Furthermore, when asked to describe challenges that they anticipated in developing scientific skills, 59% of the students did not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes a scientific skill.

This confusion seems to be due to students being unsure of what constitutes a scientific "process" in the context of the question.

The 10% subsample approach constitutes a scientific comprise in periodontal epidemiology by determining a so-called inflation factor to correct the periodontal epidemiological underestimation accompanied with the index tooth-specific approach and, on the other hand, to keep the time required for periodontal measurement within acceptable limits [ 27, 29].

The interviews by no means constituted a scientific survey.

The group was chosen to provide a rough cross section, but it did not constitute a scientific sample.

While several days of interviews with people who live, work or shop in the area does not constitute a scientific survey -- and no one interviewed claimed to be gay -- some factors seemed apparent.

See also C. Hempel, Philosophy of Natural Science 49 (1966) ("[T]he statements constituting a scientific explanation must be capable of empirical test"); K. Popper, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge 37 (5th ed. 1989) ("[T]he criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability, or refutability, or testability").

Does the emergence to prominence of "chaos theory" (nonlinear dynamics) itself constitute a scientific revolution and, if so, is it a distinctly Kuhnian revolution?