constantly in opposition

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "constantly in opposition" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a situation where two parties or ideas are consistently at odds with each other. Example: "The two political parties have been constantly in opposition, making it difficult to reach a consensus on key issues."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

It constantly sets in opposition biological and adoptive connections.

The New York Times - Arts

In healthy people, the two systems are constantly working in opposition, making the heart rate fluctuate.

The New York Times - Health

Somehow, we are constantly being put in opposition, a binary divide that is damaging to both scientists and non-scientists.

The Guardian

When in opposition the JVP constantly demanded the WB to quit Sri Lanka.

BBC

Bayern's formation is constantly in flux, adapting to the opposition.

The Guardian - Sport

The role of this unit coach requires hours of intensive research, an eye for detail in constantly searching for opposition strengths and weaknesses, and space to think about how to be innovative around implementing and engaging with the players.

The Guardian - Sport

It's certainly easier to live in a world where you are not constantly being challenged by people whose thinking is in opposition to yours.

HuffPost

Kim Dae Jung, when in opposition, complained that the country's secret service bugged his telephone, constantly watched his home and photographed all his visitors.

The Economist

107.9 ff)., whose works he cites constantly as proof of the correctness of his claims about Epicurean doctrine and its proper interpretation, often in opposition to the interpretations of other, somewhat older or contemporary Epicureans.

SEP

These groups constantly faced opposition from a strong political minority of Orthodox Jews living in the city.

Wikipedia

Englishmen in opposition.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "constantly in opposition", ensure the context clearly establishes what entities or ideas are in conflict. This provides clarity and prevents ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid overusing "constantly in opposition" to describe minor disagreements. Reserve it for situations where the conflict is fundamental and ongoing, not just occasional.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "constantly in opposition" functions as a prepositional phrase, often modifying a verb or noun to describe a continuous state of disagreement or conflict. As Ludwig AI states, it is grammatically correct. The examples show its use across various contexts to illustrate enduring antagonism.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

20%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

13%

Wiki

13%

Academia

13%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "constantly in opposition" is a grammatically correct prepositional phrase used to describe a persistent state of conflict or disagreement. While not exceptionally common, as supported by Ludwig AI, it appears in diverse contexts, particularly in news, science, and formal business settings. Alternatives like ""perpetually at odds"" and "in perpetual conflict" offer similar meanings with subtle differences in emphasis. When using this phrase, ensure the context clearly defines the source and scope of the ongoing opposition.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

perpetually at odds

Focuses on the state of being opposed, highlighting the irreconcilable nature of the conflict.

in perpetual conflict

Emphasizes the ongoing nature of the disagreement.

always conflicting

Highlights the continuous nature of the clash.

in constant disagreement

Directly states the lack of agreement.

everlasting antagonism

Suggests a deeply rooted and enduring hostility.

incessantly clashing

Emphasizes the relentless and repetitive nature of the opposition.

chronically dissenting

Highlights a habitual pattern of disagreement or objection.

habitually opposing

Implies a consistent and ingrained tendency to be against something.

unremittingly hostile

Stresses the continuous and intense nature of the opposition.

ceaselessly contending

Focuses on the unyielding struggle or competition.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "constantly in opposition" in a sentence?

Use "constantly in opposition" to describe situations where two entities or ideas are perpetually in conflict. For example: "The two political factions were "perpetually at odds", hindering any progress."

What are some alternatives to "constantly in opposition"?

You can use alternatives like ""perpetually at odds"", "in perpetual conflict", or "always conflicting" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "constantly in opposition" in formal writing?

Yes, "constantly in opposition" is suitable for formal writing, especially when describing enduring disagreements or conflicts between established entities or ideas. Other similar alternatives are "ceaselessly contending", "unremittingly hostile".

What's the difference between "constantly in opposition" and "frequently disagreeing"?

"Constantly in opposition" implies a more fundamental and ongoing conflict, while "frequently disagreeing" suggests more isolated incidents of disagreement. The phrase "habitually opposing" is also a valid alternative.