The phrase "constant revision of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the ongoing process of reviewing and updating something, such as a document, plan, or strategy.
Example: "The project requires a constant revision of the initial proposal to ensure it meets the current needs."
Alternatives: "ongoing review of" or "continuous update of".
But that constant revision of the built environment can also feel like an erasure of history.
The institute has many international committees, and some, especially those concerned with classification research and the constant revision of the Universal Decimal Classification, are very active.
Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-four (1949) showed a world in which a tyrannic unity is imposed by a collective solipsism, and contradictions are liquidated through the constant revision of history that the controlling party decrees.
These abstractions allow automated testing to continue providing feedback despite the constant revision of the system.
The good news is all these improvements trickle down eventually, but the bad news is that the constant revision of the technology results in continuously high prices.
The piece was thoroughly discredited for reconstructionist history and yet the initial paper that sparked the idea by Roger Williams University School of Law professor Carl T. Bogus still stands as perhaps the single most compelling case for Madison's deliberate wording and constant revision of the language of the second amendment.
He made constant revisions of his early compositions, in which he found technical imperfections.
Thus, even at his most conservative moments as a proponent of Socialist Realism, Lukács is motivated by a keen intuition concerning the tragic consequences of this aspect of modern culture and, as the constant revisions of his position show, by a sensitivity to the inappropriateness of all conceptions of the human condition which do not appropriately deal with this problem.
Lastly, when thinking of standardization as an approach for reusability, Sillitoe and Marzano (2009) observe that standard approaches may be problematic due to the diversity, internal variations, and constant revisions of knowledge and knowledge traditions world-wide, making generalizations potentially dangerous.
The constant revisions of the date became a running forum joke at the fan site Halo.Bungie.Org.Org
However, like all systems, it is in need of constant revision, to ensure it can meet evolving challenges.In December I will propose to the commission a blueprint for the most far-reaching reform of European merger control since the Council of Ministers adopted the Merger Regulation in December 1989.
