Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(11)
The reported frequency for a constant diagnosis was 38.8 44.7 % for probable migraine and 24.6 53.9 % for probable TTH.
Among patients with headache recurrence, the proportion of constant diagnosis was higher for probable migraine than for probable TTH plus probable OPHD (59.2 vs. 23.1 %; P < 0.001).
Among the patients with headache recurrence, the proportions of constant diagnosis according to follow-up duration were similar in probable migraine (60.0 vs. 58.3 %; P = 0.906).
The proportions of constant diagnosis between probable migraine, probable TTH, and probable OPHD were compared in 2 subgroups defined by follow-up duration (>3 and ≤ 6 months vs. > 6 and ≤ 10 month), respectively (Fig. 3).
We further compared the proportions of constant diagnosis by follow-up duration (>3 and ≤ 6 months vs. > 6 and ≤ 10 months) in probable migraine, probable TTH, and probable OPHD, respectively.
In patients with headache recurrence, the proportion of constant diagnosis was significantly higher for probable migraine group than for probable TTH plus probable OPHD group in both the subgroups of follow-up period (P = 0.040 and P = 0.007, respectively).
Similar(49)
Of 4 OPHD patients followed for 3 6 months, only 1 patient (25.0 %) had constant probable diagnosis, whereas probable diagnosis of all 2 patients followed for > 6 and ≤ 10 months progressed to definite diagnosis.
In probable TTH, the proportion of constant probable diagnosis was lowest in patients with the missing criterion of total headache period.
The proportions of constant probable diagnosis did not significantly differ between follow-up duration periods (>3 and ≤ 6 months vs. > 6 and ≤ 10 months) in all headache subtypes.
To evaluate the diagnostic stability over time, we compared the proportions of constant headache diagnosis between subgroups of follow-up duration (>3 and ≤ 6 months vs. > 6 and ≤ 10 months) in each headache subtype.
The proportions of constant probable diagnosis by primary headache subtype were as follows: 75.9 % (n = 63) for probable migraine, 73.7 % (n = 70) for probable TTH, 71.4 % (n = 5) for probable TAC, and 76.0 % (n = 19) for probable OPHD (Fig. 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com