Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(19)
He's one of the few constant characters.
Each comparison involved 1000 permutations and was repeated with and without constant characters.
Following alignment with Prankster, 6452 characters were included in the parsimony analysis that included 4664 constant characters, 886 characters that were parsimony-uninformative, and 902 parsimony-informative characters.
The whole data set included 296 taxa with 1,544 aligned but highly gapped positions, including 252 constant characters, 263 parsimony-uninformative changes, and 1,029 (67%) parsimony-informative positions.
The whole ITS alignment generated by Clustal W for the reduced data set featured 118 taxa and 1,553 aligned positions, including 328 constant characters, 186 parsimony-uninformative changes, and 1,039 (67%) parsimony-informative positions.
The best-scored whole ITS alignment generated by SATé featured 300 taxa and 1,296 aligned positions, including 191 constant characters, 210 parsimony-uninformative changes, and 895 (69%) parsimony-informative positions.
Similar(41)
This concatenated dataset contained 938 parsimony informative characters, 239 uninformative variable characters, and 1496 constant (invariant) characters.
Through their constant character annihilations, they inflict on others the emptiness they feel in themselves.
That humor becomes all the funnier with the constant character switching.
If ξ ∈ T p, then ω : ( Z p, + ) ⟶ ( C p, ⋅ ), x ↦ ξ x, is a locally constant character which is actually a locally analytic character if ξ ∈ { ξ ∈ C p : v p ( ξ − 1 ) > 0 }.
A proper name like 'Hillary Rodham Clinton' (or indeed any non-indexical expression) has a constant character, picking out the very same object in every context in which it's used, whereas indexical expressions like 'I' or 'this' have variable character, picking out different things in different contexts of use.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com