Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
No statistically significant difference was found in lesion conspicuity for "tumour mass" (p = 0.176) and for "lesion" (p = 0.700).
Adding an axial T1-weighted sequence (WI) may be helpful in evaluation of the course of the peroneal nerve branches and may enhance the conspicuity for peroneal nerve lesions.
Thus, the authors concluded that the conspicuity for malignancy was strong when vessels were detected in a hypoechoic lesion more than 2 mm in thickness.
The confidence level in morphology and contrast kinetics (three-point scale) and conspicuity for each lesion (five-point scale, -2 to +2) was assessed by a single observer (SKAR).
8, 13 Detection of microvessels in a skin lesion increases the conspicuity for malignancy, but reports in the literature are still variable in that microvessel detection has shown a good specificity for malignancy (90%100%%) but sensitivity has been in the 34%100%% range.
Similar(55)
The feature maps are combined into two conspicuity maps, for intensity and for edge orientation.
There are differences between the three types of masks but they are not significant Table 2 Conspicuity indices for experiment 2 A B C D N 13 13 13 13 Mean (mm) 97,8 169,4 156,8 134,2 SD (mm) 23,6 295% 31,7 31,4 95% conf.
Open image in new window Fig. 11 The results of experiment 2. There is a significant difference in the conspicuity index for stimuli A, the sign against the cluttered wall, compared to stimuli B, where the sign is enhanced by a black mask.
This can lead to blurring of the resulting images and low vessel conspicuity, particularly for smaller vessels.
The resulting feature maps on the different scales are normalized and combined similar to Eq. 13, to form three conspicuity maps, for intensity, color, and orientation.
FLAIR imaging at 7 T yields a high SNR,with better contrast for WM substructures and the iron-bearing basal ganglia, and has potential for good conspicuity of WM lesions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com