More specifically, contexts evaluated as emotionally involving and significant may ingenerate a consonant shared response by the observer, who firstly recognizes and secondly "mimic" (by face and autonomic behavior) the somatic markers related to the experienced emotions [ 61].
The remaining letters were nontargets, drawn from a set of 10 other consonants, requiring no response.
These analyses were only applied to the data from the words condition of the experiment on the grounds that the left IFG showed diminished response to consonant strings and no response to unfamiliar faces (see Figure 2).
In sum, there is a significant difference in magnitude of LDN response to consonant change between the two groups at the third syllable and this difference associates with differences in overall nonword repetition score.
(2) In order to analyze the potential transfer of phonetic features of the consonant between stimulus and response, a repeated measures ANOVA was performed comparing the outcomes for voicing, place, and manner of articulation within the lexical replacement strategy only (i.e., the best "model" for the stimulus-response variation resulting from the statistical analysis in (1)).
To further elucidate the underlying mechanisms, evoked magnetic fields in response to consonant-vowel events (synthetic versus spoken) were recorded (oddball design: standards=binaural/ba/, deviants=dichotic/ba/-/da/; 20 right-handed subjects) under different attentional conditions (visual distraction versus stimulus identification).
Families' responses about consonant and vowel production are shown in Table 6.
Results show that the characteristic AEP waveform in response to consonant-vowel-syllables is on a par with those of non-speech sounds with analogue temporal characteristics.
In the present study we showed that the characteristic AEP waveform in response to consonant-vowel-syllables shows an almost identical spatio-temporal pattern as in response to non-speech sounds with similar temporal characteristics.
In the present study, we recorded and compared scalp auditory evoked potentials (AEP) in response to consonant-vowel-syllables (CV) with varying voice-onset-times (VOT) and non-speech analogues with varying noise-onset-time (NOT).
