consistently failed

USAGE SUMMARY

“consistently failed” is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is usually used to describe a pattern of repeated failures. For example, “He had consistently failed to meet his deadlines.”.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

But they've consistently failed.

The Guardian - Film

It has consistently failed to act.

The Guardian - Business

He has consistently failed to apply himself.

The New York Times

It has consistently failed to act," Cable said.

The Guardian - Business

The government has consistently failed to prosecute them, he said.

The New York Times

Mr Berlusconi has consistently failed to react unless bullied.

The Economist

The militant group has consistently failed to retain popular support, or at minimum, acceptance.

The Guardian

It's a smokescreen for a drug policy that has consistently failed over a 50-year period.

The Guardian - Opinion

Bollywood films have always felt like a test of my identity, one I've consistently failed.

The Guardian - Film

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

In one neglect patient, the illusions consistently failed to work.

Neuropsychologia

Since his arrival in 2007, the team has consistently failed to make the MLS play-offs.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To add impact, follow "consistently failed" with a specific explanation of the consequences or impact of the failure. For instance, "The safety mechanisms consistently failed, leading to multiple accidents."

Common error

Avoid using "consistently failed" without providing specific examples or details about the failures. Simply stating that something "consistently failed" can lack impact if not supported by evidence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "consistently failed" functions as a verb phrase, indicating a recurring lack of success or fulfillment of expectations. This is supported by Ludwig, which shows its usage across varied contexts to describe repeated instances of not meeting a standard or achieving a desired outcome.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

41%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "consistently failed" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression that denotes a recurring lack of success. According to Ludwig, it commonly appears in news, scientific, and business contexts, indicating a neutral to professional register. The phrase serves to highlight persistent shortcomings, often with a critical undertone. For alternative phrasing, consider options such as "always failed", "repeatedly failed", or "systematically failed", depending on the specific context and desired nuance. It's important to use "consistently failed" with clear context and supporting details to maximize its impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

always failed

Replaces 'consistently' with 'always', emphasizing the unvarying nature of the failure.

systematically failed

Suggests a failure that is not only consistent but also methodical or ingrained in a system.

repeatedly failed

Highlights the recurrence of failure, similar to consistently.

continually failed

Emphasizes the ongoing and uninterrupted nature of the failures.

persistently failed

Implies a stubborn or determined failure despite repeated attempts or efforts.

invariably failed

Indicates that failure is the expected or usual outcome in all cases.

regularly failed

Focuses on the habitual aspect of the failure.

routinely failed

Suggests that the failure is part of a normal or established process.

uniformly failed

Implies that the failure is consistent across all instances or categories.

steadfastly failed

Suggests a firm or unwavering failure, almost as if by choice.

FAQs

How can I use "consistently failed" in a sentence?

You can use "consistently failed" to describe a pattern of repeated failures. For example, "The project consistently failed to meet its deadlines", or "The security system consistently failed to detect intrusions".

What are some alternatives to "consistently failed"?

Alternatives include phrases like "always failed", "repeatedly failed", or "systematically failed", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "consistently failed" and "occasionally failed"?

"Consistently failed" implies a regular, repeated pattern of failure, while "occasionally failed" suggests that failures are infrequent or irregular.

Which is more formal, "consistently failed" or "always failed"?

"Consistently failed" is generally considered more formal and professional than "always failed", making it suitable for business and academic contexts.