consistent with what has been stated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "consistent with what has been stated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when you want to indicate that something aligns or agrees with previously mentioned information or statements. Example: "The findings of the study are consistent with what has been stated in the earlier research papers."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

The quantitative genetics of stem defects in Douglas-fir are generally consistent with what has been observed in other conifers.

Forest Ecology and Management

These numbers are broadly consistent with what has been an under-reported decline in drone use overall.

The Guardian - Opinion

The strategies identified are consistent with what has been pointed out in the research literature.

International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education

These percentages are consistent with what has been published in recent literature.

Agricultural and Food Economics

This is consistent with what has been reported for the baseline HMM [18].

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

This observation is consistent with what has been reported in studies with a variety of PEGylated drug delivery systems [31 34].

Nanoscale Research Letters

Our results are consistent with what has been previously reported.

Chinese Journal of Cancer

This downward shift is consistent with what has been previously reported for PCL blended with dexamethasone.

Biomacromolecules

This pattern is also consistent with what has been observed in rodent models of sepsis [ 8].

Critical Care

This finding was consistent with what has been found in other studies [ 4, 10, 12, 24].

BMC Public Health

This is consistent with what has been seen in other echinoids [ 49].

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "consistent with what has been stated" to clearly link new information or findings to previously established facts or statements, enhancing the logical flow of your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "consistent with what has been stated" in situations where a simpler phrase like "as mentioned before" or "similarly" would suffice. Overusing formal phrases can make your writing sound unnecessarily complex.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "consistent with what has been stated" functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun or clause to indicate agreement or alignment with previously mentioned information. It connects new details or findings to established contexts.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "consistent with what has been stated" is a grammatically correct adjectival phrase used to show agreement or alignment with prior information. While Ludwig AI states that it is correct and usable, there are currently no direct examples available, indicating a potential rarity in its explicit usage, although the underlying concept is common. When writing, it's useful for establishing logical connections in formal and scientific contexts, though writers should be mindful of overuse in simpler situations. Consider alternatives like "in accordance with what has been said" or "in line with what has been mentioned" to vary your phrasing while maintaining clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in accordance with what has been said

Replaces "consistent with" with "in accordance with", emphasizing compliance or conformity.

in line with what has been mentioned

Uses "in line with" instead of "consistent with", suggesting alignment or agreement.

as per what has been indicated

Replaces "consistent with" with "as per", indicating adherence to instructions or information.

agreeing with what has been expressed

Focuses on the agreement aspect, replacing "consistent with" with "agreeing with".

corresponding to what has been specified

Emphasizes the correspondence or matching of information.

in keeping with what has been detailed

Highlights the consistency with previously detailed information.

as stated previously

A more concise way of referring back to earlier statements, omitting "consistent with".

following what has been communicated

Indicates adherence to previously communicated information.

conforming to what has been disclosed

Highlights the alignment with previously disclosed information.

as previously mentioned

A shorter, more direct way to refer to earlier statements.

FAQs

How can I use "consistent with what has been stated" in a sentence?

You can use "consistent with what has been stated" to show that new information aligns with something previously mentioned. For example, "The study's findings are consistent with what has been stated in earlier research papers".

What are some alternatives to "consistent with what has been stated"?

You can use alternatives like "in accordance with what has been said", "in line with what has been mentioned", or "as per what has been indicated" depending on the context.

Is it redundant to say "consistent with what has been stated previously"?

While not strictly redundant, adding "previously" can be unnecessary as "stated" already implies a past action. Using "consistent with what has been stated" is usually sufficient.

What is the difference between "consistent with what has been stated" and "in agreement with what has been stated"?

While similar, "consistent with what has been stated" emphasizes alignment or correspondence, while "in agreement with what has been said" highlights direct concurrence or approval. The choice depends on whether you want to stress alignment or explicit agreement.