Sentence examples for consistent review process from inspiring English sources

Regardless of the decision-making method chosen, a formal, consistent review process that evaluates cost, compares products, examines implications, analyzes risk, uses evidence, and includes safety and outcome measures is vital to success.

Structured case classification Consistent review process and inclusion of the same evaluations for all cases being discussed (e.g., use of a scaled rating system).

The key design strength is the consistent temporal review process with a limited number of experienced reviewers working to agreed criteria with access to contemporaneous medical records.

"A consistent and predictable review process will stimulate investment here at home and keep jobs from going overseas," Dr. Jeffery Shuren, the director of the agency's medical device division, told reporters.

We recommend that the Cochrane Collaboration have consistent editorial policies, streamline the review process to decrease the time to publication, provide support for review authors when changes to the protocol occur, and provide a better infrastructure for updating Cochrane reviews.

The review process was consistent with the PRISMA guidelines for the conduct of systematic reviews [ 28].

The finding that GPs must first of all value the improvement activity offered as part of the peer review process is consistent with aspects of adult educational theory which suggests that learners often undertake activities that they conceive as being of personal interest and highly relevant to their daily professional practice [ 20].

Investing in a consistent and comprehensive policy development and review process is likely to increase documentation of the outcomes of the national HIV response.

The policy update coincided with WTSI quinquennial strategic review and this allowed the scientific programs to develop data sharing plans (requested as part of the review process) that were consistent with the policy.

MPs want to see more consistent training for those involved in the review process, particularly for researchers in the early stages of their careers.

Our proposed expansions to the ethical review process for PCSTs are consistent with but extend beyond the principles promulgated by the American Medical Association regarding PCSTs [ 51].