Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
based on Andrich's (1978a, b) extension of the Rasch rating scale model The FACT-G and FACT-P had good internal consistency (baseline alpha = 0.84 and 0.87, respectively).
See Table 1 for means and standard deviations for year 1 and year 2. PAID scores showed good internal consistency, baseline PAID Cronbach's alpha =.92, posttest PAID Cronbach's alpha =.94, and thentest PAID Cronbach's alpha =.96.
Similar(58)
To maintain consistency, the baseline was set automatically by the software.
To maintain consistency, the baseline was set automatically by the software [11].
Internal consistency for baseline scores for the current sample was α = 0.89.
Domains of the TSQM demonstrated evidence of strong internal consistency at baseline and at 12 weeks (Cronbach α = 0.88-0.93).
The internal consistency at baseline and test-retest reliabilities at 4-week interval was examined in both the non-clinical and clinical samples.
However, the scale maintained the same excellent level of internal consistency at baseline and at 3 years follow up, and demonstrated good correlation with other robust scales.
The scale has been widely used (Cella & Chalder, 2010) and had excellent internal consistency at baseline and follow-up in the current sample.
Weighted kappa and percent agreement indicated consistency between Baseline and Historical PA levels during HS, and lower consistency for PA engaged in either before HS or during the year before Baseline.
The 18 items remaining (Box 2) had high internal consistency at baseline in the prospective cohort data (Cronbach's alpha 0.87) and no single item removal improved on this.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com