However, we consider this explanation highly unlikely for two reasons.
We consider this explanation unlikely, however, for two reasons.
We consider this explanation unlikely, and the SIR for uterus unspecified supports this view.
Some students consider this explanation key to a successful class discussion (Nicol and Boyle, 2003).
We consider this explanation unlikely, despite the substantially lower than expected hospital mortality (MICO 26% vs. 44%, control 21% vs. 43%).
Second is the possibility that RP may also have been a consequence of chemotherapy, even though we consider this explanation highly unlikely.
We consider this explanation to be highly unlikely since all of our playback stimuli used in this study were recorded from one population of free-flying ravens at the same location in Austria.
Although we cannot formally exclude the possibility that these presynaptic effects are due to retrograde signaling from transfected postsynaptic neurons, given the internal consistency of our different functional approaches and their close correlation with the literature, we consider this explanation unlikely.
We consider this explanation less likely for the following reasons: genes encoding such enzymes (chitinase, β-glucanases and proteases) were underrepresented in our EST library, and we detected the upregulation of only a few genes encoding major extracellular proteins or of the secretory pathway.
In considering this potential explanation and the high frequency of participants reporting heat as a barrier to physical activity in this study, physical activity initiatives must take into account the environmental element of heat.
In addition, they considered this mixed explanation as the biological explanation according to the theory of evolution (Fig. 3).
