Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
This can be seen by considering the time scale and the Lyapunov transformation: (3.25).
The primary concern of controlled morphology for nanopatterning is to develop ordered microphase-separated morphology by considering the time scale for segregation, namely segregation strength during solvent evaporation.
Similar(58)
Compared with the other nonlinear observers without considering the time scales, the proposed observer demonstrates faster convergence and more accurate properties.
For example, consider the time scale with.
Let (mathbb{T}) be a regulated time scale, (a,b inmathbb{T}), and consider the time scale ([a,b]_{mathbb{T}}) such that (sigma(a)=a).
Now we consider the time scale T = { n 2 : n ∈ Z ≥ 0 } with the graininess function μ ( t ) = 1 / 2, t ∈ T. So A is nonregressive and the matrix exponential function e A ( t, 0 ) does not exist.
Let (a,bin mathbb{T}), consider the time scale ([ a,b ] _{ mathbb{T}}) and a function (rin C_{mathrm{ld}}^{1} ( [ a,b ] _{ mathbb{T}}, mathbb{R} ) ) with (r^{nabla}(t geq 0).
(1) If we consider the time scale (mathbb{T}^{a}_{ q,h)}) with (v_{0}) replaced by v, then the integration over ([frac{h}{1-q},t]) yields the definition of the nabla ((q,h -integral in the form int^{v}_{h/(1-q)}phi(u)nabla_{(q,h -integralinl(1-q^{-1}bigr)v+q^{-1}hbigr)sum ^{infthe}_{k=0}q^{-k}phibigl(q^{-k}v+[-k]_{q}h bigr), provided that the informte serint^{v}verges.
However, CB1R-mediated morphological effects reported in the present study may not result from reduced neuronal adhesion, considering the time-scale of the rapid neuronal retraction.
Considering the time-scale of the distribution of time to seroconvert and the cumulative incidence up to the age of 60 days, we assumed that those seropositive at the age of 60 days approximately reflected those who were infected until the age of 45 days.
If has a left-scattered minimum, then otherwise Here we consider the time scales with and.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com